ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Hyponatremia occurs in about 30% of patients with pneumonia, including those with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection. Hyponatremia predicts a worse outcome in several pathologic conditions and in COVID-19 has been associated with a higher risk of non-invasive ventilation, ICU transfer and death. The main objective of this study was to determine whether early hyponatremia is also a predictor of long-term sequelae at follow-up. METHODS: In this observational study, we collected 6-month follow-up data from 189 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients previously admitted to a University Hospital. About 25% of the patients (n = 47) had hyponatremia at the time of hospital admission. RESULTS: Serum [Na+] was significantly increased in the whole group of 189 patients at 6 months, compared to the value at hospital admission (141.4 ± 2.2 vs 137 ± 3.5 mEq/L, p < 0.001). In addition, IL-6 levels decreased and the PaO2/FiO2 increased. Accordingly, pulmonary involvement, evaluated at the chest X-ray by the RALE score, decreased. However, in patients with hyponatremia at hospital admission, higher levels of LDH, fibrinogen, troponin T and NT-ProBNP were detected at follow-up, compared to patients with normonatremia at admission. In addition, hyponatremia at admission was associated with worse echocardiography parameters related to right ventricular function, together with a higher RALE score. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that early hyponatremia in COVID-19 patients is associated with the presence of laboratory and imaging parameters indicating a greater pulmonary and right-sided heart involvement at follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Background: Studies on SARS-Cov-2 in Behet's syndrome (BS) patients are limited to two small case series from European centres.[1,2] Objectives: We aimed to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Italian BS patients referring to Careggi University Hospital (Florence, Italy) and to evaluate the possible association between BS disease activity and treatment and the risk of Sars-CoV-2 infection among patients with BS. Methods: A survey was conducted among 335 subjects diagnosed with BS and followed at Careggi University Hospital. Moreover, we conducted a case-control study. Cases were described in term of SARS-CoV-2 manifestation and prognosis, changes in disease activity, and in pharmacological therapies. Sars-CoV-2 negative controls matched 1:3 by sex, age and disease duration ± 5 years were randomly selected. Results: Out of 335 BS patients, 12 declared to have/have had SARS-CoV-2 infection (3.6%). Eight were females (median age of 40 years), with a median duration of BS disease of 6 years;five had active disease. Nine patients reported fever, 9 myalgia/arthralgia, 5 gastrointestinal symptoms, 5 anosmia/ageusia, 5 cough, 3 headache, 3 fatigue, 2 breathlessness, panic attacks and dizziness (one each). Before infection, patients were treated with corticosteroids, colchicine, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), traditional DMARDs [azathioprine (n patients = 4), methotrexate (n=1)], and biologics DMARDs [adalimumab (n=6), infliximab (n=2), secukinumab (n=1), and canakinumab (n=1)]. Therapy was suspended for a median time of 33 days in 9patients and resumed after a median time of 5 days from negativation. Regarding SARS-CoV-2 treatment, most patients started or increased corticosteroids, whereas heparin and antipyretic drugs were used in 4 and 5 patients, respectively. Cases were comparable to controls in terms of disease manifestations, activity, and immunomodulating therapy, with the only exception of corticosteroids, whose daily dose was significantly higher in cases (Table 1). Conclusion: Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Italian BS patients is 3.6%, similarly to the Italian general population (4.2%). Disease activity at time of infection was not associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most patients interrupted biologic DMARDs. However, use of DMARDs, seemed not to be associated with an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, while higher doses of corticosteroids resulted to be more common among patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection as compared to controls. No patient required hospitalization or died. Our experience shows encouraging data about BS patients who do not appear be at greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or complications than the general population.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among Behcet's syndrome (BS) patients, evaluating the possible association between demographic and clinical features and the risk of infection. Moreover, we aimed to evaluate the possible association between BS disease activity and treatment, and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. METHODS: A survey was conducted on BS patients followed at the Behcet's Centre of the Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. We further evaluated the possible association between BS disease activity and treatment, and the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: Out of 335 BS patients contacted, fourteen cases of SARS-CoV-2 were identified between April 1st, 2020 and February 9th, 2021, suggesting a prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among BS patients of 4.2%, in line with the data of the general population in Italy (4.4%). When comparing clinical features between SARS-CoV-2 cases and matched SARS-CoV-2 negative BS patients, we found that the presence of different disease manifestations did not significantly differ between the two groups. SARS-CoV-2 cases and controls were also comparable in terms of immunosuppressive therapy, with the only exception of corticosteroids (71.4% vs. 35.7%, p=0.030), whose daily dose was significantly higher in cases than controls [5mg/day (IQR 0-10,) vs. 0 mg/day (IQR 0-5), p=0.005], suggesting that the right timing of usage and the more appropriate dosage of corticosteroid are a key question for the better management of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, patients with BS do not seem to be at a greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe complications compared with the general population.